Please let me know 'how' those joint efforts could be materialized. Regards.
Best, Sebastián Samaruga --- http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar On Nov 10, 2017 8:36 AM, "Corrado Campisano" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Seb, > > universaal comes with a data/service homologation, > as appropriate elements in the (shared) ontology > <https://github.com/universAAL/ontology> > shall be defined first, before they can be used. > > At the moment only ontology elements for "personal/health assistance" > and for "measuring/acting (IOT)" have been created, since that was the > project objective, while nothing is there for any business-oriented task. > > > For example, some time ago I asked them to include the Dublin core ontology > <https://github.com/universAAL/ontology/issues/5>, > so that "my digital documents" (bills, tickets, bank statements, contracts, > etc), > could be "handled" by the platform, semantically, not like dspace > <http://www.dspace.org/> does, > and semantically for real, not like openKM <https://www.openkm.com/> does. > > > So, once you have your specialized ontology in place, > then you can build "semantic" clients & servers, and > also "semantic" event notification producers & listeners: > all will go on the bus and be "routed" semantically. > > > Now, the whole platform runs on Karaf OSGi container, > which is the same engine Servicemix runs on, > but smix itself has no semantic technology in it. > > So, the "joint effort" could be for you to avoid reinventing the wheel, > such as adding a semantic engine to servicemix, which uAAL did already, > and work on implementing the "business pieces" uAAL misses. > > > > PS: it is not "my" project, you know, I'm just quite interested. > > UAAL has been funded (2 million eur) by the European Union first, > now there's people from top EU research institutions: > http://www.universaal.info/blog/post/4873/The-launch-of- > The-universAAL-IoT-Coalition/ > > > Let me know. > > > Regards, > Corrado. > > > 2017-11-10 3:05 GMT+01:00 Sebastian Samaruga <[email protected]>: > > > Hi, > > > > I'll be taking a look at your project. Seems like you'd like to > everything > > be 'pluggable'. That maybe sounds familiar to me but my approach is to > > homologate data and services (without they knowing they are being > > 'plugged'). > > > > Are you using a specialized containerized / OS for wrapping 'things' up? > > P2P (for IoT)? > > > > Which kind of 'joint efforts' do you think could be possible? I'm in a > very > > early analysis stage for the platform I would like to build. My > preliminary > > (early) drafts and documentation are in: > > > > https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics > > > > Being Document.pdf in the code section the most up to date element. > > > > Best, > > Sebastián Samaruga > > --- > > http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar > > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 2017 3:45 AM, "Corrado Campisano" <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Sebastián, > > > > take a look at *universaal* then: > > > > is based on karaf container > > (which was born from servicemix) > > and works with ontologies > > > > http://www.universaal.info/ > > https://github.com/universAAL > > > > > > (EU invested 2M in this) > > > > > > copying universaaal dev-list > > > > maybe you want join efforts > > > > > > cheers, > > corrado > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-11-05 2:55 GMT+01:00 Sebastian Samaruga <[email protected]>: > > > > > Our attempt is to build a systems integration framework which leverages > > the > > > possibilities of different datasources with different schema and > > different > > > services with different APIs to interact with each other in a called > > > "Business Domain Integration of Problem spaces". > > > > > > For example, there could be DBs regarding customers, services regarding > > > orders and an ERP handling inventory tasks, each from a different > > > organization or business. > > > > > > The task in hand is to leverage the 'semantic' capabilities of the > > Semantic > > > Web in order to being able to build 'metamodels' which abstract > > > interactions of components from their underlying platforms, treating > > > different source components in the same way due to Functional > Programming > > > techniques. > > > > > > This is possible of being achieved de-aggregating everything into its > > > constituent parts and performing sorts of 'alignments' between > > > corresponding parts at each level (schema / instances of data, > > information > > > and knowledge) of, for example: DB tables, columns, rows, services > > > behaviors, etc. > > > > > > The point is that Apache ServiceMix / JBoss Fuse seems as an ideal > > platform > > > for this endeavor. As I have no prior experience in these products I > ask > > > myself if I'll be able to construct the necessary custom routing > > (reactive) > > > components for this layering of models and also a custom OSGi blueprint > > > namespace for ease of declarative implementation of solutions. > > > > > > As far as the project goes there is only a bunch of documents into a > > GitHub > > > repository while we finish the analysis and design phase. Please > consider > > > that we are looking for help into the right manner to implement this > > > 'correctly' on these platforms. > > > > > > Our current 'work' is available at: > > > https://www.github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics > > > > > > Thanks in advance. Best, > > > Sebastián Samaruga > > > --- > > > http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar/2017/09/hi-everyone-im- > > > sebastian-software.html > > > > > >
