Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for the report. Let me know if you need help about this during the weekend.
Regards JB > Le 6 mars 2020 à 16:23, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > Hi > > So I'll prepare the last report during the weekend and include there the > information about plans to move the project to attic. > > Best regards > > Krzysztof > > > On 06.03.2020 15:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: >> Hi Freeman, >> >> Yeah, it’s the plan I’m about the send on the mailing list. >> >> I’m preparing some bundles set (latest ;) ) and in the meantime, I’m >> preparing the "transition plan". >> >> I will send the plan during the weekend. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 6 mars 2020 à 15:50, Freeman Fang <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>> +1. >>> And we can do it after ServiceMix Bundles 2020.02 release(which should be >>> the last bundle release from SMX side). >>> Long Live, Servicemix! >>> Thanks! >>> Freeman >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 3:33 AM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The consensus seems really lazy... ;-) >>>> +1 to retire ServiceMix and move the bundles / specs into Karaf if that was >>>> what you had in mind (given the thread subject, i had doubts for a moment). >>>> >>>> Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à 07:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I was busy with ActiveMQ and Karaf and didn’t have time to move >>>>> forward about this discussion. >>>>> >>>>> In order to avoid to pollute threads, I would start several formal votes >>>>> (with options) about the moves we discussed. >>>>> >>>>> I’m preparing this for today. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Le 28 janv. 2020 à 15:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> If the ServiceMix project is fairly active for SMX Bundles and Specs, >>>> we >>>>>> clearly have a "slow pace" on distribution releases. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here, we have two approaches possible: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. We clearly state on website and codebase that users should better >>>> use >>>>>> Karaf and create their own custom distribution if needed. >>>>>> 2. We begin a regular pace in distribution release. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think 1 makes more sense and it's worth to be mentioned in the SMX >>>>>> distribution. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding 2, I would like to propose a ServiceMix 8.0.0 with: >>>>>> - Update to Karaf 4.2.x >>>>>> - Update to Camel 3.0.1 >>>>>> - Update on Activity >>>>>> - Cleanup and improved SMX features >>>>>> - Add itests in smx for coverage >>>>>> >>>>>> Another more "important" decision would be to retire ServiceMix to >>>> attic >>>>>> and move SMX Bundles and Specs as Karaf subprojects (as we have Karaf >>>>>> Decanter, Cave, Cellar, ...). >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it's fair to discuss about that as we don't see lot of activity >>>>>> on ServiceMix distribution/releases. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>>
