Well I need to get caught up on my shale subprojects then! Thanks for the pointer.
Sean On 7/31/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I won't be able to look into this deeply until tonight, but the comment > > about Hypersonic makes me think we might have a second license issue to > deal > > with on this application. You might want to think about using Derby for > the > > back end instead. That's what my JPA based example uses. > > I'll have to look into what you did. Does Derby provide an in-memory > db option? That's what I'm looking for ... Yes it does have an in-memory mode. Indeed, shale-sql-browser uses Derby in this way. Craig > Craig > > Sean >
