On Jan 14, 2008 11:33 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2008 8:59 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all (and in particular Gary VanMatre). > > Now that Shale is being dismantled, I think that Clay could live as a > > subproject of Tiles, since its primary goal is to work with templates. > > I think that both projects could benefit from each other, though Clay > > is tightly connected to JSF. > > I actually don't think Shale is going anywhere... what seems more > likely is that we'll "retire" bits of it (like the Tiles integration) > in favor of other things that already exist, and _maybe_ split up the > distribution so things can be released separately as people are > interested in them.
For what its worth, I am very interested in the future of clay as I have a lot of work invested in it. I am willing do whatever it takes to keep it around. Ryan > > -- > Wendy >
