On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1 The copyright date in the notice file is 2007 instead of 2008 > Aside from the copyright date, noted above, I only verified that notice.txt, > manifest.mf and license.txt existed
I'll have a look at that. > > The artifact where built using JDK 1.5.0_13. Should they be built using > 1.4? Hmm, I didn't think about that. You're probably right, at least everything except the Tiger stuff. Rahul, did you use 1.4 to build the non-Tiger artifacts for 1.0.4? Thanks for checking. I figured there's little chance this first hack would be the final one :-) Greg
