Making feature independent and use them in mixed mood? It sounds great, but challenging. It will take a lot of time to do, i think...
Juan Pan panj...@apache.org Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere On 09/28/2019 18:44, Sheng Wu wrote: Does making this change in 5 make more sense? And we provide v4 unchanged for user convenient. Sheng zhangli...@apache.org <zhangli...@apache.org>于2019年9月28日 周六下午6:15写道： > The scope of ShardingSphere keep expanding. Sharding is not the unique and > core feature for ShardingSphere anymore. > > So we plan to create pluggable infrastructure for database proxy and JDBC > driver which to let users run it without any additional function, just > transparent transmission. ShardingSphere can add more features into `EMPTY` > infrastructure, such as sharding, master-slave, encrypt, > distributed-transaction, orchestration and so on. > > The API may look like: ShardingDataSource, MasterSlaveDataSource, > EncryDataSource, DistributedTransactionDataSource and > OrchestrationDataSource, the yaml and other configuration methods should > change to this way too. > > Every features are independent and can be work together which using > composited and append-able way. We can provide SSDataSourceFacade to manage > how to use them together. > > This is one of the reason to why we do not release for 4.0.0 stable version > soon, we want more discuss to make decision to change API before 4.0.0 > stable version release. > > Any suggestions? > > ------------------ > > Liang Zhang (John) > Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo > -- Sheng Wu SkyWalking, Shardingsphere and Zipkin
