+1, primary data source is better than source data source, I prefer this one.
------------------ Sincerely, Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere Hongwei Li <[email protected]> 于2020年9月7日周一 上午11:04写道： > I saw the movement of replacing Master/Slave, even single word 'master' or > 'slave' in industry. > > One option which is used a lot is primary/secondary. > Primary and replica are also reasonable terms to describe distributed > databases. > > Personally I like 'primary' more than 'source' as the alternative of > 'master', if MySQL is not the only case. > Take the below sentence as an example. > > (1) Judge primary data source visited in current thread. > (2) Judge source data source visited in current thread. > > The first one makes more sense than the second. > > Conductor/Member is also seen as the alternative. But I don't think it is a > good choice for databases. > > Just my 2 cents > > BR, > Hongwei > > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 5:43 AM [email protected] < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I want to discuss to rename MasterSlave module to ReadWriteSplit module. > > > > MySQL[1] has already change the master and slave to source and replica. > > > > Some concepts I plan to change: > > > > MasterSlave -> ReadWriteSplit > > MasterDataSource -> SourceDataSource > > SlaveDataSource -> ReplicaDataSource > > > > Please advice me. > > > > [1] https://mysqlhighavailability.com/mysql-terminology-updates/ > > > > ------------------ > > > > Sincerely, > > Liang Zhang (John) > > Apache ShardingSphere > > >
