I agree with kevin Clair.
I don??t think it is necessary to provide so many ways to synchronize using the
configuration center.
Maybe we can separate the synchronization of the gateway and admin from the
management page, similar to the nameserver of rocketMQ
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????:
"dev"
<[email protected]>;
????????: 2021??5??25??(??????) ????5:00
??????: "dev"<[email protected]>;
????: Re: Discuss ShenYu support other config center
Hi kevin Clair
I couldn't agree with you more
For now, it's too hard for developers, so should we provide a lot of
defaults for users to choose from, and subsequently we can use SPI to
abstract and let users to extend themselves
Kevin Clair <[email protected]> ??2021??5??25?????? ????4:54??????
> Maybe we can open an entry for users to develop their own data
> synchronization, if Shenyu's current data synchronization mode is not
> satisfied. Similar to our custom development plug.
>
> XiaoYu <[email protected]> ??2021??5??25?????? ????4:18??????
>
> > Hi Community
> >
> > For ShenYu , data configuration and synchronization is a very
important
> > feature.
> >
> > Currently we have 4 kinds of synchronization methods, http, websocket,
> > nacos, zookeeper, do we need to add other synchronization methods,
such
> as
> > apollo [1], etcd [2], consul [3].
> >
> > Welcome to discuss in the comments and look forward to better
> suggestions.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/ctripcorp/apollo
> > [2] https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd
> > [3] https://github.com/hashicorp/consul
> >
> > Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
> >
>
