Ideally this code should be it's own project or subproject -- then wink and shindig could use it directly.
Also, a shindig release cannot rely on SNAPSHOT releases. It's just not allowed. Are there other json libraries out there that might make sense? What about Jackson? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Han Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm quoting response from Nick Gallardo - Wink team below. There is no > public discussions on the Wink list about the issue at this point. > "The source is not committed anywhere as of yet. We are working through > the final legal clearances on our side to be able contribute this code to > Apache. The legal work is set to complete in the very short term, at > which point the code will go to Wink. > > Optimally, this work would be included as an optional module within Wink. > Given the usefulness of consuming something like this outside of the > runtime, perhaps a separate downloadble module is the best answer. When > the code is fully integrated, a release of Wink should be done to make > this fully available and not just part of a snapshot." > Han > > > > From: Paul Lindner <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 06/10/2010 05:16 PM > Subject: Re: Cleanning up Shindig for json.org license issue > > > > The plan looks good. Can you refer us to the discussions on the Wink list > about this json library? Is the source committed anywhere yet? Will this > library be independent of wink or bundled with other software? > > > On Jun 9, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Han Nguyen wrote: > > > In response to this email thread regarding json.org license issue here > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/shindig-dev/201005.mbox/%3coffe5c5529.88141ce8-on8725772e.0073fca5-8525772e.00746...@us.ibm.com%3e > > > > > I have opened a JIRA for this issue here > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1342 > > > > Although the WINK team has not yet committed their clean of the license > > issue json library to Apache yet, we anticipate it will be done soon. > > Fortunately, we've been working with them collaboratively, and have the > > source to get ahead start on updating Shindig with their jar. > > The change is mostly updating import statements in Shindig Java code, > > however it is quite pervasive and touches most of Shindig Java modules. > > I'm outlining what I will be doing for the next two weeks here to get > your > > suggestions and consensus, also to find out if anyone has missed the > > original discussion thread above and has also started working on the > same > > work so we can collaborate more on this. > > > > 1. update the pom files to remove json.org, and point to the location of > > > the json jar in WINK (local on my box at the moment) > > 2. fix all the broken imports. > > 3. update and add some try catch/exception required by the new lib. > > 4. Since we've done this work on Shindig Beta5, and had to add a few > > additional minor methods for JsonSerializer, I expect we'll need to do > the > > same for the trunk. Details method will be posted in the patch later > > 5. Run mvn test and make sure all test cases passed. > > 6. Testing the gadgets in the wild, we have a collection of random > gadgets > > to test, but feel free to suggest any gadgets that would make good test > > cases here. We'll mostly look for the same behaviors of the gadgets in > the > > code base prior vs. after the code update. > > 7. Once WINK made the json library code drop in Apache, we'll go back > and > > update the pom files for the correct location, and maybe some minor > > cleanups. > > 8. submit patch(es) to jira and code review > > > > I'm looking forward to hearing your opinions and suggestions. > > Thanks, > > Han > > >
