Thanks for the information.
From: Michael Hermanto <mherma...@gmail.com> To: dev@shindig.apache.org, Cc: Stanton Sievers/Westford/IBM@Lotus Date: 02/23/2011 15:43 Subject: Re: Common Container viewParams versus renderParams On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@us.ibm.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing around with the common container and have been wondering > why there are both viewParams and renderParams that can be passed to > shindig.container.Container.prototype.navigateGadget. > shindig.container.ViewParam defines only the 'view' constant. This > constant is also defined in shindig.container.RenderParam. It even > appears that shindig.container.GadgetSite.prototype.render will use the > renderParams['view'], if it exists, before using viewParams['view']. > > Is there a reason why one would want to use viewParams to provide the view > instead of providing it in renderParams? > view-params are not commonly used. These are params that are meant to be applicable only to a specific view. You're right that CC only cares about viewParams['view'], but through this, CC allows one to put an arbitrary JSON that will be serialized (stringif'ied) as &view-params= in the render iframe URL, to be possibly used by the gadget. To specify view of a gadget render, continue to use renderParams['view']. > Thanks, > -Stanton > >
