On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Mark W. <[email protected]> wrote: > Eric et at... > A couple of things that I wanted to get on the table before I can vote +1 on > activity streams: > 1) I wanted to circle back on the OpenSocial specific extensions that I > mentioned above, specifically, deliverTo: (or to:) and actionLinks. I've > created a patch, uploaded it to Issue 1140 and applied it.
+1 to "to". > 2) I think we should add a bit more introductory text around the linkage > between the activity streams work and OpenSocial spec. This is also in the > patch. Agreed. The extent of the linkage certainly is not clear and there are a number of inconsistencies between the two data models that folks need to be aware of.. specifically in the base object type definitions. > 3) We added a media link data type, but nowhere do we tie this back to media > items. I think this is a gap. We either need to add the fields to media > items as well, so that a media item CAN BE a media link, or some how resolve > this. +1... media item like should be made an extension of the activity stream media link. > 4) We wanted to deprecate the existing activity work. I suggest we remove it > from 2.0, or at a minimum, clearly mark it as deprecated in the spec. +1 - James > Please let me know your thoughts... > -Mark W. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OpenSocial and Gadgets Specification Discussion" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/opensocial-and-gadgets-spec/-/ulQZRyIgBA4J. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-and-gadgets-spec?hl=en. >
