FYI, there have been some recent changes in the common container to expose 
a callback to the container page that allows for the persisting and 
retrieval of persisted preferences.

  /**
   * @see setprefs.js setprefs feature.
   */
  this.rpcRegister('set_pref', function(rpcArgs, key, value) {
    var site = rpcArgs[osapi.container.GadgetSite.RPC_ARG_KEY];
    var setPrefs = 
self.config_[osapi.container.ContainerConfig.SET_PREFERENCES];
    if (site && setPrefs) { // Check if site is not already closed.
      var data = {};
      for (var i = 2, j = arguments.length; i < j; i += 2) {
        data[arguments[i]] = arguments[i + 1];
      }
      setPrefs(site.getId(), site.getActiveGadgetHolder().getUrl(), data);
    }
  });

A container may specify functions to the CommonContainer that will be 
called to retrieve and set preferences for a particular gadget.
Please also note that gadget site id will now prefer the id attribute of 
the gadget site element, so that named locations for specific gadgets can 
have preferences persisted accordingly.

If you are going to be providing a default preference persistence impl, it 
would be great if you could hook into this :) 



From:   daviesd <davi...@oclc.org>
To:     <dev@shindig.apache.org>, 
Date:   07/27/2011 01:09 PM
Subject:        Re: Example implementation for user prefs?



Paul,

Sure. Give me a few days, I just got back from vacation. I'll have to 
figure
out whether the container token will be sufficient for this, as I had to
apply other patches to get the gadget token to be used.

Thanks,
doug


On 7/27/11 12:58 PM, "Paul Lindner" <lind...@inuus.com> wrote:

> Can you write this up a patch so we can make this the default
> implementation?  This is something I've been meaning to do for months.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM, daviesd <davi...@oclc.org> wrote:
> 
>> Actually, I was lazy and went with the approach of layering userprefs 
on
>> top
>> of appdata as follows:
>> 
>>    container.rpcRegister('set_pref', function(rpcArgs, data) {
>> 
>>        var prefName = rpcArgs['a'][1];
>>        var prefKey = 'up_' + prefName;
>>        var prefValue = rpcArgs['a'][2];
>> 
>>        var data = {};
>>        data[prefKey] = prefValue;
>> 
>>        osapi.appdata.update({
>>            userid : '@me',
>>            groupid : '@self',
>>            appId : '@app',
>>            data : data
>> 
>>        }).execute(function(response) {
>>        });
>>    });
>> 
>> This is with anticipation that appdata and userprefs will align as
>> discussed
>> here:
>> 
>> http://code.google.com/p/opensocial-resources/issues/detail?id=1182
>> 
>> Of course this also requires you to implement appdata server side. 
Right
>> now I¹m just using the JsonDb implementation (in-memory), but we¹ll be
>> writing a persistent layer soon.
>> 
>> I also ran into issues with the correct token (the gadget one with the
>> appid
>> that you¹ll need to use to index the data) being passed to the appdata
>> request.  You can search for my other thread about this.
>> 
>> doug
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/25/11 6:53 PM, "Henry Saputra" <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> If you want the user pref to be persisted in the database you need to
>>> implement the server handler for it.
>>> 
>>> I remember Doug Davies has tried to add persistent layer for user
>>> pref. Maybe he could share his progress.
>>> 
>>> Including him in the email.
>>> 
>>> - Henry
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Mat Schaffer <m...@schaffer.me> wrote:
>>>>> So with some research it looks like I'm supposed to be implementing 
my
>> own
>>>>> server module. Is that pretty much accurate?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Again, any advice or RTFMs (with a link to the respective FMs) is
>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Mat
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Mat Schaffer <m...@schaffer.me>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So I noticed that UserPref items don't work on the sample 
container
>> which
>>>>>>> makes sense after finding this thread:
>>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tlwtlo4mrnrpz4w5
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is there any good example of best-practice for implementing user
>> prefs in
>>>>>>> my containing application? Do I just make my own
>> shindig-container.js and
>>>>>>> handleOpenUserPrefsDialog? And does the page we point to just 
render
>>>>>>> information into a div with id of `this.id`?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The gmodule code appears to be obfuscated, so it's a bit hard to
>> tell >>>
>> what
>>>>>>> the right course of action would be. Any documentation or 
assistance
>>>>> would
>>>>>>> be appreciated.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Mat
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 





Reply via email to