> On 2011-10-03 16:07:31, Paul Lindner wrote: > > For the future: since you're a committer and have CLA on file I'd just go > > ahead and submit non-feature related fixes like this directly. Less time > > clicking in jira == more time coding :) > >
Thanks Paul. We would all like more time coding. Committed revision 1178441. - Ryan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2149/#review2264 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-10-03 15:01:39, Ryan Baxter wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/2149/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-10-03 15:01:39) > > > Review request for shindig, Henry Saputra and Dan Dumont. > > > Summary > ------- > > GadgetHandlerTest.testAllowedRpcSercurityIds could potentially fail depending > on the order the RPC service IDs returned in the JSON array. The code in > GadgetsHandlerService returns the IDs in a set which does note guarantee > order, so the order of the IDs in the JSON array may be different. > > > This addresses bug SHINDIG-1634. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1634 > > > Diffs > ----- > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/servlet/GadgetsHandlerTest.java > 1178236 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2149/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran mvn build > > > Thanks, > > Ryan > >
