We do use both versions internally and the PHP one is still valuable for fast 
prototyping & integration with existing CMS. We had to do some work to get it 
working with the AS data model but I believe if there is enough bandwidth to 
continue this track it could be valuable in order to widespread the use of OS 
APIs into existing PHP-based CMS.

walter

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Agustin Casiva [mailto:casivaagus...@gmail.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 7 marzo 2012 18.49
A: dev@shindig.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: [DISCUSS] Support and active development for PHP version of Apache 
Shindig

From my point of View, as a PHP developer, Shinding for PHP is a great
alternative, but some clients ask for features existent in the Java version
and have the hope use those features in the PHP Version (by example Caja).
This is a real problem for the PHP shinding vendors.

In the other hand, the gap between Shindig for PHP and Shindig for Java is
huge.

I think, if the PHP version will continue alive, the dev team for PHP must
grow. I can see that only Bastian is working with the PHP version in the
last time (maybe I'm wrong); could be great if some others PHP developers
joins as active developers.

If no one is thinking in maintain the PHP version maybe the best option is
abandon the work of PHP and leave the current work in
PHP to be continued outside of the Shindig Project with other team (as a
Fork).

My two cents.

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Ryan J Baxter <rjbax...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Henry, from an IBM point of view we are focused on the Java version, we do
> not use the PHP version....and I don't see that changing any time soon.
>
> -Ryan
>
>
>
>
> From:   Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> To:     dev@shindig.apache.org, us...@shindig.apache.org,
> Date:   03/01/2012 02:38 PM
> Subject:        [DISCUSS] Support and active development for PHP version
> of Apache Shindig
>
>
>
> Hi Shindig community,
>
> Currently the Apache Shindig project supports both Java and PHP code
> for the server side execution.
> However, recent development in PHP have been very limited and in
> effort to catch up and getting closer to the OpenSocial specifications
> the PHP part have lot of catching up to do.
>
> On the other hand the Java development efforts have been very active
> and closer to OpenSocial specs.
>
> So, I would like to bring out this discussion to get some feedback
> about what is the future of the PHP side of Shindig. Most active
> contributors in Java side dont have enough bandwidth to make the
> duplicate updates in both PHP and Java parts of the server side code.
>
> I would like to send a VOTE thread later but would like to get inputs
> about how to energize or deal with the PHP part of Apache Shindig.
>
> As community I think we want Shindig to be the reference
> implementation of OpenSocial to help new adopters to embrace and
> support the specs, and to do this I think we need to refocus and
> regroup the effort to bring back the healthy and active contributions
> from community.
> So far the PHP side has been lacking development of the new features
> and bug fixes that the Java counterpart has enjoyed. This cause a lot
> of confusions about how big the difference between the Java and PHP
> implementations which ideally should be equal.
>
> This is also a shout out to many active committers and PMC of Shindig
> that still want and have bandwidth to keep contributing to Shindig
> development.
>
> Chime in and let your voice be heard!
>
> - Henry
>
>
>


--
Ing. Casiva  Agustin

Mail/Msn/GTalk/Jabber: casivaagus...@gmail.com
Skype: casivaagustin
CEL : 054-03722-15270639
Site: http://www.casivaagustin.com.ar

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone 
indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla 
conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate 
ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne 
immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, 
Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged 
information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, 
printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender 
by return e-mail, Thanks.

Reply via email to