Wow! I didn't know about this. Thanks for the info. Yes, this might just work. I'll let ya know.
doug On 9/4/12 10:42 AM, "Stanton Sievers" <ssiev...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Does the Modules.override functionality in guice help at all? I'm > wondering if you can override the DefaulyGuiceModule with a module that > does you binding. > > -Stanton > On Sep 4, 2012 9:47 AM, "daviesd" <davi...@oclc.org> wrote: > >> If I wanted to implement my own Authority implementation (replacing >> BasicAuthority) it appears that I would have to completely override the >> DefaultGuiceModule and just change one line to bind to my implementation. >> However, this means every time I upgrade artifacts I have to make sure the >> default implementation hasn¹t changed (new bindings, deleted bindings, >> renamed, etc.). Is this the intended behavior or am I missing something? >> We currently do this with the social apis, but of course those are split >> out >> into their own guice module and meant to be overriden. If I could at least >> extend DefaultGuiceModule and have it call my additional configuration >> that¹d be great, but I don¹t think you can unbind with guice (that I¹ve >> found). Ideas? >> >> Doug >>
