-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/16/12 3:34 PM, Ryan Baxter wrote: > So you are saying according to the spec Account for example should > be a subclass of a PluralField object which has the properties > defined within the spec [1], right?
That is one way of doing this. There are other ways as well, of course. My concern is that the current implementation is not consistent for the plural fields. So, either use *one* representation for plural fields (for example by using List<PluralField<?>>) and use this consistently for all entities... > [1] > http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Data.xml#Plural-Field > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jan Willem Janssen < > [email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/13/12 12:30 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: >>>> As for your question, I think I am kind of loss on what your >>>> concerns are? >>>> >>>> Could you give a bit more example of what conflict or >>>> confusion about matching the fields for the Person data type >>>> with the spec? > > For example, taken the following fields: > > - "accounts": the spec defines this field as PluralField<Account>. > Shindig implements this as List<Account>, with no possibility to > specify the primary account; - "addresses": also a > PluralField<Address>, which is implemented in Shindig as > List<Address>, while the Address object has a field primary; - > "emails": PluralField<Email>, implemented as a List<ListField> in > Shindig. > > So it appears there are three ways of defining a PluralField in > Shindig (actually two: the first item is a bug IMO). Which one > should be used for adding new PluralFields? > > In addition: there are several fields in Person implemented as > enumeration of fixed values, while the spec doesn't mention > anything on these value constraints (e.g. "drinker"). Shouldn't > these fields be made less restricted? > - -- Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect +31 631 765 814 /My world is:/ Luminis Technologies B.V. IJsselburcht 3 6825 BS Arnhem +31 88 586 46 30 http://www.luminis-technologies.com http://www.luminis.eu KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93 BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQf+JSAAoJEKF/mP2eHDc43YUP/1e7Rp7/NrRjWUFaKM5upSgB gGHkbFmSoDJOhXwg5K2nqe7/yxi4c66m7rxVlbav+5o1lhxG88f2e/wxdkyc09u2 4ZmgpS0E4wR7lJdjbDSz57pnlRGzGaN0MfYSzdVxhfQ1cvNI8eng1IaWzNODCMna PleGmT1jAeO2gNrg+0GHjh6wlTBOxwep+0hwDjUfOt+9FxsBa3VoWRsQJvLgaRPh A0QDhuqfpPjE2kGPVHtt4uVTh2toZKCbLcRuEmg4IQ7XQWol/uuoKjjDZkSLRAqz K9uqSAnLQHQg7IJzNqNLTCdhH2jHW3bSquWvYLCnBenJLm0tLFYhw2rk1cgIcTSn NLEzLQ+TTdfXe6aZrd29uB3W+fVxXrvOh7apHna0pQGmsS0x9d9zkf16E07r9TcA tCS486qA6a0FTwp/5K+8hCC0obnuVG6a0Rmm77oAHFY7YAiPKKCZ5PGZhwuLXYmP /1pYscPkXadExA9nAXABY36HUxlRgSbvmARu+wzUjKbmtG4jgeniixqM5KWI/TE+ hVdJ1psT2GCnof/1t5fWsaMIDnlFkonv2+ueGdTrPZonJVhYaB2HeZ/D51K9SoZm agP51jdulWj7h1rpdRM3lMmxfbYO8l8+LmWfAGjHWhJKazqd0a8nY45m1Mp65BZk s/wHB4i+0QYjbhdBBFGV =ifXA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
