I am actually still +1 for just 2.5.1. We agreed that Shindig version will adhere to OpenSocial specs up to minor version which in this case is 2.5.x
- Henry On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is what I found on version numbers [1]. From what I gather after > reading that using 2.5.0.1 would be considered "non-standard". The > only downside to this would be the version numbers would be compared > as strings. We could use 2.5.0-fix1 which would be considered > standard, but I don't think that buys us anything with regards to > version comparison. I could pose a question to the Maven users list > and see if they have any advice. > > [1] > http://books.sonatype.com/mvnref-book/reference/pom-relationships-sect-pom-syntax.html > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@apache.org> > wrote: > > +1. Shindig-1924 is one such cleanup. I also agree with staying in line > > with the spec. > > > > I would just want to make sure we have no technical or process issues > with > > maven artifacts (or the like) with 4 numbers in the version. > > On Aug 5, 2013 7:29 PM, "Ryan Baxter" <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> The current version of trunk is set to 2.5.1. I am wondering what > >> people think of changing that to 2.5.0.1? There are a few cleanup > >> changes that have already been identified that would be good to get > >> out there. At same time we want to stay in sync with the spec version > >> so I don't think we want to release 2.5.1 yet. What does everyone > >> think? > >> >
