Hi Andy, I haven't heard any objections from anyone so lets assume Shindig supports this, at least from a review perspective. I cannot commit us to proving any implementation since we have a limited number of committers and contributors. Of course those working on the w3c side are welcome to contribute implementations to Shindig.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10/06/14 12:45, Ryan Baxter wrote: >> >> That is unfortunate. As I am sure you are aware we usually do things >> via consensus and would take a vote on something like this. It is >> very rare (in my observation) that one person speaks for the entire >> community. I assume everyone will back it, but still it is better to >> do things the "right way". I will wait until tonight until making any >> decision to give everyone else the change to way in. > > > OK (I'm based in the UK so by 21:30 UTC (22:30 local) please) > > Andy > > >> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/06/14 02:13, Ryan Baxter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for reaching out Andy. Is there any way we can get an >>>> extension on the deadline? I would like to put this out for a vote to >>>> the Shindig community but we usually give everyone 3 days to review >>>> and vote. Since there is a very short runway on this I am not sure >>>> everyone will have time to review. >>>> >>> >>> Not really - it's determined by W3C and because they have announced a >>> deadline they will be keen to stick to it. >>> >>> This is just a request for support - it does not actually commit the >>> project >>> to do anything specific. >>> >>> If you are implementing a spec, or a part of a spec, then not ticking the >>> first 3 "intends" would be routine. >>> >>> You can include a brief (one sentence-ish) advertising for your work. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> W3C are looking for support in creating an Open Social WG. >>>>> >>>>> ASF is a member of W3C and can express such support (I'm the W3C AC rep >>>>> for >>>>> Apache - I push web buttons). >>>>> >>>>> I've had a request from Harry Halpin to add support - if this projects >>>>> wants >>>>> me to go ahead and express support, please let me know - the deadline >>>>> is >>>>> 23:59, Boston time on 2014-06-10. >>>>> >>>>> the question are below: >>>>> >>>>> Activity: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-activity-proposal.html >>>>> Working Group: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html >>>>> Interst Group: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-ig-charter.html >>>>> >>>>> The survey covers: >>>>> >>>>> Q1::Support for the Proposal >>>>> >>>>> (choose one - can add a comment): >>>>> >>>>> My organization: >>>>> * supports this Activity Proposal as is. >>>>> >>>>> * suggests changes to this Activity Proposal, but supports the proposal >>>>> whether or not the changes are adopted (your details below). >>>>> >>>>> * suggests changes to this Activity Proposal, and only supports the >>>>> proposal >>>>> if the changes are adopted [Formal Objection] (your details below). >>>>> >>>>> * opposes this Activity Proposal and requests that this group be closed >>>>> [Formal Objection] (your details below). >>>>> * abstains from this review. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Q2:: Support for Deliverables of the group >>>>> (choose any that apply - can add a comment) >>>>> >>>>> My organization: >>>>> * intends to review drafts as they are published and send comments. >>>>> * intends to develop experimental implementations and send experience >>>>> reports (your details below). >>>>> * intends to develop products based on this work (your details below). >>>>> * intends to apply this technology in our operations. >>>>> * would be interested in participating in any press activity connected >>>>> with >>>>> this group. >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> VP W3C Relations. >>>>> >>> >
