great! submitted. On Mon Aug 18 2014 at 4:16:56 AM Ryan Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > -Ryan > > > On Aug 18, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Stanton Sievers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > I don't see a reason to still support maven 2. > > > > Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos. > >> On Aug 18, 2014 6:26 AM, "Andreas Kohn" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2? > >> Maven 3 seems to be "stable" since quite a while. > >> > >> -- > >> Andreas > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building? > >> I > >>> could then update to the latest yuicompressor. > >> >
