+1 to Oracle JDK6. Cheers, Chris
On Oct 23, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Adam > > Le 23/10/12 20:18, Adam Estrada a écrit : >> While I don't yet use JDK7, I know that I will have to eventually so >> including this now is definitely a good thing. >> >> +1 from me too > > Thanks, I just made a try a few minutes ago: > > https://builds.apache.org/job/sis-jdk7/site/apidocs/index.html > > The stylesheet is not identical to the default JDK7 one. In particular, I > have let the font size to the default browser size (by contrast, the JDK7 > stylesheet sets the font side to 76% of the default size, which I found a > little bit small). However the default size may be a little bit too big. Does > anyone as any preference? > > In order to give more value in having 2 builds, I tried to change the JVM of > "trunk" from "Oracle JDK6" to "IBM JDK6". However the deployment failed for a > reason apparently unrelated to SIS. Given that they will be no IBM JVM after > version 6, maybe it is not worth the effort? > > I tried "Open JDK6" and it worked, but it may not be worth neither since it > is almost identical to Oracle JDK6. The Jenkins server also have a "JDK6 > (unlimited security)" choice, but I have no idea what it is. > > So I have left the configuration to its usual "Oracle JDK6". Any opinion? > > Martin >
