Hey Guys, Fine by me -- if there hasn't been movement by mid-next-week I'll pick this up.
Cheers, Chris On Nov 25, 2012, at 10:41 AM, Adam Estrada wrote: > Hi Joe, > > By all means go right ahead! Your contributions are greatly appreciated. > > AdamJoe White <[email protected]> wrote:Hi, all, > > If no one minds, I'll take a look at this one. I've been neglecting SIS, and > this will get me back into the swing of things. > > Joe > On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:14 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Martin, >> >> If no one beats me to this by mid next week I'll take care of it. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> On Nov 25, 2012, at 12:35 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >> >>> Hello all >>> >>> I started to port more metadata classes on my local machine, but I'm still >>> hitting dependencies. Yesterday I have hit the first dependency having a >>> (minor) licensing issue. To be legally safe, I think it would be preferable >>> to have a volunteer for providing an initial commit of the class described >>> below. I only need the initial commit; from that point all subsequent >>> commits were our own. A volunteer could commit that on trunk, JDK6 or JDK7 >>> branch at his convenience. >>> >>> I would like a Range class in the following location: >>> >>> sis-utility/src/main/java/org/apache/sis/measure/Range.java >>> >>> The API of this Range class would be almost identical the the Java Advanced >>> Imaging Range class. In fact, this Range class has been added in old >>> GeoTools time in replacement to the JAI one, in order to reduce JAI >>> dependency: >>> >>> http://download.java.net/media/jai/javadoc/1.1.3/jai-apidocs/javax/media/jai/util/Range.html >>> >>> However the initial commit doesn't need to be a fully functional Range >>> implementation. In particular, I suggest to omit isEmpty(), subtract, >>> equals, hashCode and toString methods since we already have material for >>> those methods that we can merge after the initial commit. Javadoc can also >>> be omitted except for one or two class introduction sentences. >>> >>> I have wrote in more details what need to be done there: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sis/ip-review/Range.xhtml >>> >>> Click on the last link ("Range implementation hooked up") - one can see a >>> more detailed description of what needs to be done. Peoples considering to >>> volunteer should probably not read past the blue line with the "Revision >>> 29950" title in it. >>> >>> We would also need a JUnit RangeTest class, to be written from scratch... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Martin >>> >> >
