On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Martin Desruisseaux < [email protected]> wrote:
> Actually it doesn't induce any library dependency since JMX is part of > standard JDK since Java 5. Furthermore, the JVM itself uses JMX for its own > monitoring, so it is possible that JMX classes are loaded anyway, in which > case using JMX on our side doesn't add any significant cost. I was thinking that was the case too. Good deal. Now I can look at your code and get ideas for how to instrument my code with JMX :-) Been wanting to do that for a while now. Greg
