Hey Martin,

-----Original Message-----

From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
Organization: Geomatys
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:54 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Would like to replace servlet-api dependency by javaee-api

>Hello Chris
>
>Le 17/04/13 19:09, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) a écrit :
>> +1 to:
>>
>>     * NetCDF CF-1.5 to ISO 19115 bindings
>>       - happy to help here, what do you think is the starting point?
>Actually this is already implemented [1], so we just need to port that
>package. One thing very welcome would be more tests...

+1 OK.

You OK with me trying to port this?

>
>>       - should we connect to the NetCDF-Java library here? If so, I
>>         can help
>This is already done actually. We may send a notice later saying that
>this package moved to SIS...

+1

>
>>     * Storage in a simple (the most possible straightforward) database
>>       - how about storing it in Apache OODT? http://oodt.apache.org/
>>         That way we could be independent of actual database, and could
>>         leverage Apache Tika perhaps in there.
>I was not aware of this project... The description on the web page seems
>very attractive, and I would like very much some connector to it.
>
>I'm thinking more about a bridge in an optional module ("sis-oddt"?)
>than a dependency straight in the SIS core, since I would like to keep
>the amount of required dependencies low. I have the same wish for
>NetCDF: provide anything related to NetCDF in a separated optional
>module, e.g. "sis-netcdf".

++1 for sis-oodt.

>
>On the database topic, we also have an implementation for that. It is
>only 5 classes (only 2 public, a reader and a writer) [2], because most
>of the work is performed by more generic code. The idea was to have a
>straightforward "one interface = one table" and "one property = one
>column" relationship, use ISO names (not necessarily the same than
>JavaBean names), automatically add comments in the database based on the
>GeoAPI resource files, have the usual special handling for code list,
>and I think that we will also need special handling for leveraging
>PostGIS or Oracle Spatial features anyway...

We did some work with OODT and SIS earlier, my GSoC student last year
Ross Laidlaw (also on the SIS PMC) wrote this guide:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SIS/OODT+File+Manager+to+SIS+Co
nnection+Demo


Shows how if geospatial data is managed in OODT how it could be connected
to SIS. I see this as sort of "the other way around" but easily doable as
well and I'm willing to help which makes it all the better :)


>
>Anyway, we don't need to take any decision now. I just wanted to let
>peoples know what is available. We can try to finish the core metadata
>first, and come back on those two topics after?

Sure that's fine too. I think getting an 0.3 release out ASAP
(light-weight, we
can always do 0.3.1 or 0.4 shortly thereafter) would be ideal.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Chris

>
>     Martin
>
>
>
>[1] 
>http://www.geotoolkit.org/apidocs/org/geotoolkit/metadata/netcdf/package-s
>ummary.html
>[2] 
>http://www.geotoolkit.org/apidocs/org/geotoolkit/metadata/sql/package-summ
>ary.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Reply via email to