Thanks for the vote, I started the creation of a NetCDF module on my
local machine.
Maybe we should find now a naming convention for those kind of modules?
After NetCDF, we will probably have Shapefile, KML and many others. One
possible schema could be "sis-store-something", e.g.:
* sis-store-netcdf
* sis-store-shapefile
* sis-store-kml
An alternative could be "sis-data-something".
Similar question apply to the package name. In Geotk, the NetCDF
metadata part was in "org.geotoolkit.metadata.netcdf" and the Coverage
I/O part in an other package. But for SIS I would like regroup all
NetCDF stuff in a single package, for reducing the amount of packages.
What about the following?
* org.apache.sis.store.netcdf
Again an alternative could be "org.apache.sis.data.netcdf". However
"data" suggests more to me a particular set of data rather than a
storage mechanism...
Martin
