Hey Martin, I think its completely acceptable to move this now before the next major release. I do think that we need to consider changing the name "index" though as we may want to incorporate different types of indices later down the road. GeoRSS will ways be GeoRSS except with different flavors of the RSS spec (ATOM too for that matter). I think in that case the same package can hold those as subpackages.
+1 for the move and if 0.2 users have issues, we can walk them through the changes here. Adam On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Martin Desruisseaux < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello all > > I'm putting some basic blocks in the "org.apache.sis.storage" package, > proposed as the basis of storage formats in SIS. For now: > > - DataStore > - DataStoreConnection > - DataStoreException > > A NetcdfDataStore will be committed later in the "netcdf" sub-package. > However the QuadTree and GeoRSSData are currently living in the same > package, while I think they could be considered as specializations. What > about the following move? > > - QuadTree and related classes to "org.apache.sis.storage.index" or just > "org.apache.sis.index" > - GeoRSSData in "org.apache.sis.storage.rss" > > However this would be an incompatible change for Apache SIS 0.2 users... > What do peoples think? > > Martin > >
