+1 on the CLI.

Could I integrate this with the shapefile format:

sis metadata foo.shp

and have it print out the metadata?


Thanks,
Travis





On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds great, Martin.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: [email protected]
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
> Organization: Geomatys
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 12:37 PM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Proposal for a command line interface
>
> >Hello Chris
> >
> >Le 06/06/13 21:24, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) a écrit :
> >> Martin, this makes tons of sense!
> >>
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> Note: we had an issue previously for this, SIS-11 [1], however
> >> that was basically a CLI to expose querying and the Qtree interface.
> >> This was a GSoC 2012 summer project proposal, but in the end, I think
> >> that Charith ended up taking it even though it wasn't accepted for
> >> GSoC 2012.
> >Thank for letting me know. I think that we can find a way to merge the
> >options listed in SIS-11 with the proposal. For example SIS-11 list the
> >"-georss" option, which could become "--format georss" in the new
> >proposal. The "-d" (for distance) and "-radius" options may need more
> >though, since I would like to wider the scope to map projections. Maybe
> >we could revisit those later options after the sis-referencing module is
> >in.
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >     Martin
> >
>
>

Reply via email to