+1 to all bullets below.

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
Organization: Geomatys
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 12:05 PM
To: Apache SIS <[email protected]>
Subject: Proposal to move GeoHashUtils to org.apache.sis.index

>Hello all
>
>Following on the move of QuadTree related classes to the
>"org.apache.index.tree" package, I realized that GeoHashUtils could also
>be seen as a kind of index. Would it be okay to do the following?
>
>  * Move it to the "org.apache.sis.index" package.
>  * Move it from "sis-referencing" to "sis-storage" module, together
>    with QuadTree.
>  * Rename it as "GeoHashCoder" by analogy with the "geocoding" process
>[1].
>  * Make the methods non-static, for allowing configuration (precision,
>    32 vs 36 bits variants)
>
>
>Other ideas are welcome if "...sis.index" seems weird for that class.
>
>
>     Martin
>
>
>[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocoding
>

Reply via email to