Hello Chris
Le 08/06/13 06:23, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) a écrit :
I say, we release and make an RC. Releasing is light-weight. If
we need to roll an 0.4 quickly or a 0.3.1 (patch release to 0.3)
we can do that too. No biggie.
What do you think Martin et al.?
Indeed, SIS is feature-complete for what I though could be a release. I
was not planning to add any major public API. However I was hopping to
add tests and probably fix some bugs before a release. In particular, I
have not yet tested XML marshalling/unmarshalling and would be surprised
if it works right now.
What about the following? Finish GeoHashCoder and a command line
interface, then no more functionality - we would focus only on tests, in
order to release sooner.
The reason is that I would like very much for SIS to gain a reputation
of high quality library. Being 100% bug free is unrealistic, but I have
my "TODO" list of known bugs that I would like to fix before a release.
At the very least, I think that XML marshalling should be tested since I
see them as the "hearth" of a project targeting standard compliance -
this is needed for parts of WMS/WFS/WPS.
Can we try one week of test/bug fixes, and revisit the release plan next
Friday (June 14th)?
Martin
