Yep, deprecating makes a ton of sense, or removing them. Cheers, Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]> Organization: Geomatys Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, July 1, 2013 9:40 AM To: Apache SIS <[email protected]> Subject: Should we deprecate LatLon, LatLonRadius and LatLonRect? >As part of SIS-68 and SIS-69 tasks, I refactored the LatLon, >LatLonRadius and LatLonRect classes as subclasses of DirectPosition and >Envelope implementations, which are the OGC/ISO objects. This is >following up on an email discussion we had a few months ago. Should we >deprecate those classes before 0.3 release, in order to replace them by >direct usage of ISO/OGC classes in SIS 0.4? > > Martin > > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-68 >[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-69 >
