This is awesome, publish it! No worries about minor potential issues,
this is still a huge improvement!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
Organization: Geomatys
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 6:49 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Large web site update in staging area

>I ported two more pages to CMS, which I removed from Maven APT pages:
>
>     http://sis.staging.apache.org/code-patterns.html
>     http://sis.staging.apache.org/faq.html
>
>I also specified explicitly the anchors in every headers of every pages.
>The intend is to have more stable anchors if the SIS site is referenced
>by external sites.
>
>Do peoples agree for publishing those modifications?
>
>At first I was considering a mix of Maven and CMS pages. But given that
>CMS appears to be more flexible than APT/FML and reasonably easy once we
>get familiar with it, I propose to migrate everything to CMS and remove
>the corresponding documentation from the Maven site, in the hope to
>simplify maintenance. The main inconvenient I can see is that some
>manually generated CMS pages may lag behind the automatically generated
>Maven pages (team list, mailing lists, source code repository). However
>this is a minor concern if those pages do not change often. An other
>slight inconvenience is that if a class is moved or deleted, we must
>remember to perform a search in the web site repository in addition to
>the Java code repository.
>
>     Martin
>

Reply via email to