+1 Sent from my iPad
On Aug 21, 2013, at 2:30 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Estrada <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:06 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Would like to create a "profile" group of modules > >> Hey Martin, >> >> I like the idea of using a convention like "sis-profile-france" like you >> mentioned. In my mind, it makes it less ambiguous and a little bit easier >> to understand for someone brand new to the project. >> >> Adam >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Martin Desruisseaux < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello all >>> >>> We currently have 3 group of modules: >>> >>> * core (includes sis-metadata, sis-referencing, sis-feature) >>> * storage (includes sis-storage, sis-netcdf) >>> * application (includes sis-webapp, sis-console) >>> >>> I would like to create a new group: >>> >>> * profile >>> >>> This group is about countries or organizations which define custom >>> extensions to the international standards. This group would initially >>> contains only "sis-france" (or maybe "sis-profile-france") with some >>> extensions mandated by the French government, but extensions for other >>> countries or organizations could be added in the future. >>> >>> Does it sound okay? Or is there other naming or layout proposals? >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> >
