Hello all, I just sync merged the Shapefile branch to trunk by running
svn merge ^/sis/trunk from the Shapefile directory. I also switched to using DataStoreException in the shapefile driver. The last thing needed is to switch to the new DefaultFeature in sis-feature. I am not sure how to import this currently. Any ideas on doing this? Thanks, Travis On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 from me.. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Travis L Pinney <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, August 19, 2013 3:00 AM > To: dev <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Proposal for merging Shapefile branch to trunk > > >Hi Martin, > > > >That sounds good to me. There are a couple things I want to improve, such > >as better exception handling and more tests but I think it is close. I can > >sync up the Shapefile branch and use your sis-feature if others have no > >objection . The link you sent looks like a reasonable way to represent an > >interface for a Feature. > > > > > > > >Thanks, > >Travis > > > > > > > > > >On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Martin Desruisseaux < > >[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hello Travis and all > >> > >> Would it be a good time to start the moving the Shapefile code from its > >> branch to the trunk? If so, what about the following plan? > >> > >> I noticed that the code contains a Feature class [1]. Features are a > >>wide > >> topic which will concern most SIS modules. Consequently I suggest to > >>create > >> a core/sis-feature module, put only the Feature class in it, and try to > >> make it closer to the GeoAPI-pending Feature interface [2] (not > >>necessarily > >> implement that interface right now, but at least try to make it > >> compatible). Once we have basic Feature class, the remaining of > >>Shapefile > >> store could follow. > >> > >> If peoples agree, I could create that initial core/sis-feature module. > >>Any > >> advice/objection? > >> > >> Martin > >> > >> > >> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/sis/branches/Shapefile/** > >> > >>storage/sis-shapefile/src/**main/java/org/apache/sis/**storage/shapefile/ > >>< > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sis/branches/Shapefile/storage/sis-shap > >>efile/src/main/java/org/apache/sis/storage/shapefile/> > >> [2] http://www.geoapi.org/**snapshot/pending/org/opengis/** > >> > >>feature/Feature.html< > http://www.geoapi.org/snapshot/pending/org/opengis/f > >>eature/Feature.html> > >> > >> > >
