How about sis-shapefile just to be canonical and simple.

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
Organization: Geomatys
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, August 26, 2013 7:27 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Proposal for merging Shapefile branch to trunk

>Which module name do you think would be preferable? "sis-shapefile" or
>something like "sis-esri" (or "sis-esri-formats", etc.) ? The later
>would keep room for future ESRI formats in the same module. I'm neutral
>on this topic, this is up to you.
>
>     Martin
>
>
>Le 26/08/13 15:15, Travis L Pinney a écrit :
>> Those formats are common in ESRI shops, as well as Shapefiles. I am
>> not sure if they share common code because the formats are proprietary
>> and undocumented. The one I left off was ArcSDE but it may be good to
>> support that in the future with an API.
>>
>> Here is a good summary of the different ones.
>>
>> 
>>http://resources.arcgis.com/content/geodatabases/10.0/types-of-geodatabas
>>es
>>
>> GDAL works with these formats (with varying degrees of functionality)
>> as described below in the links to the GDAL documentation.
>>
>> Personal Geodatabases
>> http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_pgeo.html
>> Prerequisites:  unixODBC and MDB Tools
>>
>> File Geodatabases
>> http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_filegdb.html
>> Prerequisites: ESRI provided FileGDB API SDK
>>
>> ArcSDE
>> http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_sde.html
>> Prerequisites: ESRI provided ArcSDE client libraries
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Travis
>

Reply via email to