Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Would you prefer Markers to be dropped in the next version of SLF4J?I've just returned from holidays and have a million emails! (Not literally, thank goodness.) So, to keep it brief, my opinion is that, if SLF4J is true to its intention "to serve as a simple façade for various logging APIs", Markers would be outside the scope, as I believe they push the façade beyond "simple". I don't want to be "the guy that made us drop Markers". :-) I think Markers are a bit complex and hence beyond the stated goal of SLF4J, but their existence wouldn't cause me to stop providing SLF4J support for Simple Log. If you dropped them, I would think that SLF4J was better for it, but I wouldn't think it is bad if they stay. Graham. |
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
