Good idea.
But whatever would one do with messages at the JCL 'trace' level? :-P
robert burrell donkin wrote:
(IMO a bit more on topic for this list)
might be about time to think about creating a JCL -> SLF4J static
bridge. (take LogFactory source, gut then link directly to SLF4J
preserving binary but not semantic compatibility.)
this would give people an easy way to sample SLF4J without altering
existing APIs. may also get some interesting feedback.
- robert
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
