http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Summary: sl4j not threadsafe
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Implementations
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've taken a peek at the basic logging factory implementations.
They maintain a map of acquired loggers, as a cache.
This is good, but also a problem: the methods are not synchronized.
I can say for a fact that my application of SL4J will operate in a multithreaded
environment.
Fortunately, I can localize access to the logging factory and do my own
synchronization there.
It would be trivial for SL4J implementations to be threadsafe.
You could add an ILoggerFactory decorator *around* the existing ILoggerFactory
implementations that could provide this synchronization.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
