Hi all, After further invesigations, we found out that the Marker.contains(String marker) method should not be removed.
All impacted classes are back to the previous revision. Sébastien Sebastien Pennec wrote: > Just a quick addition to my previous email... > >> In the Marker class, Marker.contains(String marker) only existed as a >> convenience >> method for the Marker.contains(Marker marker) method. > > This sentence has to be turned around to mean what I was thinking when > writing it. > > The Marker.contains(*String* marker) can be seen as syntactic sugar, allowing > us to > call it rather than having to retrieve a Marker object and then pass it to > the > Marker(*Marker* marker) method. > > Please excuse my poor (but improving!) english :) > > Sébastien > -- Sébastien Pennec [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
