Hello Jake, Eric, Jacob Kjome wrote: > I'm quite sure that depending on com.sun.* is not an option for an > open source project. I'd never allow it for Log4j and I can't > imagine the SLF4J developers would allow it. I suggest that you come > up with an implementation of the service API for proposed inclusion > in SLF4J. There's no guarantee it would be accepted. In fact, the > odds seem against it. However, I highly doubt the SLF4J developers > are going to take the time to write it. So, the only way this has a > chance of moving forward is for someone to write it and propose it as > SLF4J's non-JDK-specific Services implementation. Not just > pseudo-code, but actual fully implemented working code. I already have posted such code which does not rely on com.sun.: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=slf4j-dev&m=117157566417290&w=2
It is not pseudo-code, but was ignored in the discomposed discussion. (I had to lookup the word "discomposed", I want to say "aufgeregt" in German, hopefully the word is not too negative or offending!) Regards Boris _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
