http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
------- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05 15:07 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't know if 10 is sufficient for an OutOfMemoryError so I'm not sure if it > will really fail without the patch in place but this test isn't that > good/important anyway. Forcing an OutOfMemoryError is not a goal per se. > I just didn't have a better idea how to test/verify this because contains > wouldn't have been sufficient and the OutOfMemoryError was the reason I > originally found this bug. Sure, that makes sense. > Perhaps a test like adding a marker twice, removing it once and asserting that > it isn't contained anymore would be better... That's the idea. Add the same marker 10 times and check that it was added only once. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
