http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74
------- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-27 22:22 ------- That is the problem, I'm using slf4j/logback in my code but a library I'm required to use, requires log4j. I have no control over what methods they call on the log4j api. For a log4j-slf4j bridge to work in these situations, which would be the most likely case (using a library that requires log4j). I don't think that a getLevel() that returns getAssignedLevel() would have dire consequences on a client of the log4j api. The only time something would appear odd would be if a client called setLevel() then a call to getLevel() would not obey the contract... If that is really bad, then maintain a Level and return the result of setLevel()... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
