http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104
--- Comment #3 from Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-26 19:44:56 --- It isn't quite as convenient because it isn't created by the factory. You always have to do new XLogger(LoggerFactory.getLogger(name));. That, by itself, isn't a big deal, although LoggerFactory.getXLogger(name) would be better. My real concern is just that it is harder to maintain. If you decide to implement what is being asked for in http://marc.info/?l=slf4j-dev&m=122242476227014&w=2 then XLogger would also have to be modified. I realize that you'd also have to modify the support for JUL, Log4j, Logback and SimpleLogger as well, but it seems like a bunch of extra work for little benefit. Coding LoggerUtil.enter(logger) just doesn't seem that much more complicated than logger.enter(); -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
