http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #31 from Ceki Gulcu <[email protected]> 2009-03-25 15:13:22 --- For the sake of clarity, any approach which relies on maintaining multiple packages for slf4j-api is not going to fly. I categorically refuse to have our users deal with multiple slf4j-api packages. As such, let us not pursue the slf4j-api-jdk15 module approach any further. Abandoning the idea of slf4j-api-jdk15 package does *not* mean the end of varargs support, the actual problem we are all interested in. Let us refocus the debate. Assuming that slf4j-api with varargs support would be binary compatible with the current slf4j-api, then adding varargs support in slf4j-api, in say SLF4J version 1.6.0, would require that users upgrade to JDK 1.5. There would be no other requirements. More importantly, various libraries depending on different versions of SLF4J could live together without problems. We'll have to poll users if they would agree with this change. If they did, and assuming there are no unexpected compatibility issues, we could make a release with varargs support later this year. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
