http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137


Ceki Gulcu <lis...@qos.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




--- Comment #7 from Ceki Gulcu <lis...@qos.ch>  2009-06-26 11:40:01 ---
> I realized what my dependency problem was and I have fixed it on my side. 
> However, I believe this is still technically a bug since there is no "name"
> field on Log4jLoggerAdapter and right in the constructor it's trying to set
> this.name.

Glad to hear that you were able to solve the dependency problem.

The name field was missing because you were using the wrong version of the
slf4j artifacts. The java compiler is there to detect missing fields and other
compilations errors.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to