On 6/7/10 10:45 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Justin Edelson wrote >> And then move it to jcr.contentloader? > I think while contentloader is more an optional bundle, the namespace > prefix handling is more a required thing, therefore I would not move > this to the contentloader. I hadn't thought of contentloader being optional. In that context, I agree that nodetype and prefix loading is not a good match.
I just find having classes named *Loader which aren't in the bundle called contentloader is non-intuitive. I think I still look in contentloader when I want to debug node type loading :) But loss of a few minutes every month isn't worth a breaking change :) Justin > > Carsten
