Hi all,

I have uploaded a proposed patch including support for both issues to
http://codereview.appspot.com/2192046/.

Please comment. Thanks.

Regards
Felix



Am 17.09.2010 16:59, schrieb Felix Meschberger:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am trying to tackle issues SLING-1400 [1] and SLING-1745 [2].
> 
> The first issue is about WebDAV clients connecting to Sling on root with
> an OPTIONS request and not being happy with a redirect response, obviously.
> 
> The second issue is about client side JavaScript application framework
> which may send XHR requests to Sling, mainly POSTs destined for the POST
> Servlet but probably also other stuff. Such framework are also generally
> not very happy getting redirect responses back.
> 
> Solutions for both problems would probably have to be implemented in the
> SlingAuthenticator.doLogin method, which is called after an unsuccessful
> login or after a first request noticing that authentication is required.
> 
> So here are the options I came up with:
> 
>   * Send back a 401 response, at least for the OPTIONS request
>     to trigger a regular HTTP Basic Authentication
>   * Send back a 403 response, to indicate that access is currently
>     forbidden (we discussed this option earlier [3]).
> 
> My questions:
> 
>   - Would it be ok to special case the OPTIONS request ?
>   - Shall we generally only send back a generic credentials request
>     (may be a redirect or a form directly or whatever) if the
>     original request was GET and send back either 401 or 403 for
>     all non-GET requests, including HEAD ?
>   - Is it a good idea to send back 401 generally ?
>   - Should we only send back 401 if HTTP Basic authentication is
>     at enabled fully or enabled preemptively and send back 403 if
>     HTTP Basic authentication is switched off completely ?
>   - Am I completely off track ?
> 
> WDYT ?
> 
> Regards
> Felix
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1400
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1745
> [3] http://markmail.org/message/jwsvk6swnxvvfsyz

Reply via email to