<param name="shutdownOnClose" value="false"/> must be removed, too
Should I JIRA this? Regards Clemens > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Clemens Wyss [mailto:clemens...@mysign.ch] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2010 16:43 > An: dev@sling.apache.org > Betreff: o.a.jr.c.p.db.DerbyPersistenceManager should be replaced with > o.a.jr.c.p.bundle.DerbyPersistenceManager > > Just had a discussion (see below) on the jackrabbit ml. Possibly before > releasing the next release... > > Regards > Clemens > > Von: Clemens Wyss [mailto:clemens...@mysign.ch] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2010 16:34 > An: d...@jackrabbit.apache.org > Betreff: AW: o.a.jr.c.p.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager not "compatible" with > o.a.jr.c.p.db.DerbyPersistenceManager? > > > So s/db/bundle/ and this should work. > I can confirm that bundle and pool cope well ! > > Then we at Sling should switch from "db" to "bundle" ;-) Sling (launchpad), > per default (upon bootstrapping), still creates a repository.xml with "db"... > > > Von: justinedel...@gmail.com [mailto:justinedel...@gmail.com] Im > Auftrag von Justin Edelson > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2010 16:14 > An: d...@jackrabbit.apache.org > Betreff: Re: o.a.jr.c.p.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager not "compatible" with > o.a.jr.c.p.db.DerbyPersistenceManager? > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Jukka Zitting > <jzitt...@adobe.com<mailto:jzitt...@adobe.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 09/12/10 15:54, Clemens Wyss wrote: > I create a copy of a jackrabbit repository with > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryCopier (using > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager). > > Trying to access this copy with > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DerbyPersistenceManager > fails. > > Testcase: > 1) create a repository.xml file with > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager > 2) start/stop jackrabbit > 3) change repository.xml to > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DerbyPersistenceManager > 4) start jackrabbit > > I don't understand why pooled access should yield different persisted data... > > Bug or feature? > > Bug, the only difference between these persistence managers should be the > way they manage the database connection. > > Can you file an issue about this with more details like the exact error > messages you're seeing and the Jackrabbit version you're using? > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > I hate to contradict Jukka, but I'm under the impression that > o.a.j.core.persistence.db.* use a different schema than > o.a.j.core.persistence.pool.*. o.a.j.core.persistence.pool.* uses the same > scheme as o.a.j.core.persistence.bundle.*. > > So s/db/bundle/ and this should work. > > o.a.j.core.persistence.db.* is deprecated now (see JCR-2802) > > Justin
