[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17252871#comment-17252871
]
Julian Sedding commented on SLING-10011:
----------------------------------------
I agree with Carsten. This issue should be resolved within Jackrabbit Oak. You
couldn't directly benefit from the node bundling by traversing (in this case)
the parent relationship. But the logic for this optimization could be accessed
via the {{Session}} (most likely implemented in one of the lower layers of
Oak's implementation). The implementation might consist of a cache with weak
references to loaded nodes. I imagine such an optimization could provide
benefits beyond leveraging node bundling, and it would certainly benefit a
broader audience, because not everyone may be accessing the nodes through the
Sling API.
> Use javax.jcr.Item.getParent() when resolving parent JCR node in
> JcrResourceProvider#getParent
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-10011
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10011
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JCR
> Affects Versions: JCR Resource 3.0.22
> Reporter: Miroslav Smiljanic
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently
> [JcrResourceProvider.getParent|https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-jcr-resource/blob/org.apache.sling.jcr.resource-3.0.22/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/jcr/resource/internal/helper/jcr/JcrResourceProvider.java#L361]
> is using JcrItemResourceFactory.getItemOrNull(String path), which eventually
> is using JCR session to retrieve parent node using absolute path.
> I propose using javax.jcr.Item.getParent() instead.
> Reasoning wold be to utilise potential improvements in JCR implementation
> that would for a given node retrieve the whole subtree. That can be
> configured for example by using particular node type or node path.
> {noformat}
> root
> |
> a
> / \
> b c
> {noformat}
> If node 'a' in picture above, is matching desired configuration, then code
> below would return the whole subtree.
> {code:java}
> Node a = jcrSession.getNode("a");
> {code}
> That further means retrieved subtree can be traversed in memory, without the
> need to communicate with the JCR repository storage.
> (!)That is particularly important when remote (cloud) storage is used for
> repository in JCR implementation, and tree traversal can be done without
> doing additional network roundtrips.
> {code:java}
> //JCR tree traversal happens in memory
> Node b = a.getNode("b");
> Node c = a.getNode("c");
> {code}
> Also going from child to parent, is resolved in memory as well (proposal
> relates to this fact)
> {code:java}
> //JCR tree traversal happens in memory
> assert b.getParent() == c.getParent();
> {code}
> Jackrabbit Oak, for document node store is supporting node bundling for
> configured node type
> [http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/nodestore/document/node-bundling.html]
> Currently I am also doing some experiments to support node
> bundling/aggregation for arbitrary node store
> ([NodeDelegateFullyLoaded|https://github.com/smiroslav/jackrabbit-oak/blob/ppnextgen_newstore/oak-jcr/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/jcr/delegate/NodeDelegateFullyLoaded.java],
>
> [FullyLoadedTree|https://github.com/smiroslav/jackrabbit-oak/blob/ppnextgen_newstore/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/core/FullyLoadedTree.java]).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
