Hi, On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > ...I think we should forget about the OSGi LogListener in this context....
I agree that if we have a better way to intercept logging messages, we don't necessarily need to have the OSGi LogListener. What's useful IMO (if it doesn't make things too complicated) is to have a single way of intercepting both sources of log messages, i.e. OSGi LogService and slf4j logging. If there's an interceptor mechanism for slf4j, it can probably just register as a LogListener to get both sources. -Bertrand
