[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Timothee Maret updated SLING-9078:
----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: Content Distribution Journal Core 0.1.26
                       (was: Content Distribution Journal Core 0.1.24)

> Keep skipped offsets in memory
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-9078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9078
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Content Distribution
>    Affects Versions: Content Distribution Journal Core 0.1.8
>            Reporter: Timothee Maret
>            Assignee: Christian Schneider
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Content Distribution Journal Core 0.1.26
>
>
> In SLING-8908 we introduced a mechanism to keep track of skipped packages 
> such that in case of journal availability flip flop, the agents would still 
> progress. The implementation was done by persisting the offset in the 
> repository. In environments where many skipped packages will occur (e.g. 
> large customer with multiple agents) then those commits will start to 
> generate a non negligible load on the repository, consuming resources and 
> creating bottlenecks.
>  
> A first mitigation to this issue has been added in SLING-8965, however for 
> very large customers the mitigation will not be effective. Increasing the 
> grouping of skipped packages (e.g. 1/100 instead of 1/10) reduce the load on 
> the repository but may fail to ensure progress in case of flip/flop.
>  
> Instead of storing the skipped packages in the repository, we should keep 
> them in memory. A new service that does not reference the 
> {{JournalAvailable}} service could be added. The offsets would be 
> consolidated on demand from the stored offsets and those stored in memory. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to