[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17504480#comment-17504480
 ] 

Stefan Egli commented on SLING-10489:
-------------------------------------

* merged [discovery.oak 
PR#4|https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-discovery-oak/pull/4]

> Ignore partially started, newly joining instances to avoid disturbing 
> discovery (for a while)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-10489
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10489
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Discovery
>    Affects Versions: Discovery Commons 1.0.24, Discovery Base 2.0.10, 
> Discovery Oak 1.2.34
>            Reporter: Stefan Egli
>            Assignee: Stefan Egli
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Discovery Base 2.0.12, Discovery Commons 1.0.26, 
> Discovery Oak 1.2.36
>
>          Time Spent: 8h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Discovery.oak requires that both Oak and Sling are operating normally in 
> order to declare victory and announce a new topology.
> The startup phase is especially tricky in this regard, since there are 
> multiple elements that need to get updated (some are in the Oak layer, some 
> in Sling) :
>  * lease & clusterNodeId : this is maintained by Oak
>  * idMap : this is maintained by IdMapService (Sling)
>  * leaderElectionId : this is maintained by OakViewChecker (Sling)
>  * syncToken : this is maintained by SyncTokenService (Sling)
> Situations have been seen where Oak starts up fine, but higher level (eg 
> Sling) bundles were not activated within a reasonable amount of time. This 
> lead to discovery staying in TOPOLOGY_CHANGING state for longer than expected.
> There should be a mechanism that ignores (suppresses) newly joining instances 
> if they start up only partially. However, after a certain timeout this 
> mechanism should give up.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to